On Fri, 06 Jan 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2023, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following commits are also in the backlight-fixes tree as different
> > commits (but the same patches):
> >
> > 44bbdb7e3a67 ("backlight: ktd253: Switch to use dev_err_probe() helper")
> > c0e09423bbb4 ("dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8950 compatible")
> > 73516cbcf8d9 ("backlight: pwm_bl: Drop support for legacy PWM probing")
> >
> > Forgot to push out an updated backlight-fixes tree?
What's the branch name that you're tracking?
> Don't think so?
>
> 88603b6dc4194 (HEAD -> refs/heads/backlight-fixes, tag: \
> refs/tags/v6.2-rc2, \
> refs/remotes/mfd/mfd-fixes, \
> refs/remotes/leds/for-leds-next, \
> refs/remotes/backlight/backlight-fixes, \
Ah, wait! This is the old naming scheme.
I assume, despite the message above, you're tracking
'for-backlight-fixes', right?
> refs/heads/mfd-fixes, \
> refs/heads/for-leds-next) \
> Linux 6.2-rc2
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
