Hi all, After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c: In function 'text_area_cpu_up_mm': arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c:157:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_init_mm' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 157 | mm = copy_init_mm(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ Caused by commit 107b6828a7cd ("x86/mm: Use mm_alloc() in poking_init()") interacting with commit 55a02e6ea958 ("powerpc/code-patching: Use temporary mm for Radix MMU") from the powerpc tree. I partially reverted commit 107b6828a7cd - I left the change to arch/x86/mm/init.c applied. Though, I wonder if the powerpc tree should use mm_alloc() instead of copy_init_mm() as well? The tip tree commit says: Instead of duplicating init_mm, allocate a fresh mm. The advantage is that mm_alloc() has much simpler dependencies. Additionally it makes more conceptual sense, init_mm has no (and must not have) user state to duplicate. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpLC8miLz_AE.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature