On 2022/11/23 13:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> these warnings:
>
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:401: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:428: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:445: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:459: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:468: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
>
> Introduced by commit
>
> 3d2788ba4573 ("doc: Document CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y stall information")
>
Strange thing, I specially executed make htmldocs before, unexpectedly did not
find these warnings.
I already know why. The literal block is not indented. I will post a new version to
Paul E. McKenney. Excuse me for causing trouble to everyone.
For example:
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ In kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y or booted with
rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime=1, the following additional information
is supplied with each RCU CPU stall warning::
-rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system
-rcu: number: 624 45 0
-rcu: cputime: 69 1 2425 ==> 2500(ms)
+ rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system
+ rcu: number: 624 45 0
+ rcu: cputime: 69 1 2425 ==> 2500(ms)
--
Regards,
Zhen Lei
