On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 12:32:38PM -0700, coverity-bot wrote: > Hello! > > This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by > Coverity from a scan of next-20221104 as part of the linux-next scan project: > https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan > > You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified > lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits: > > Tue Nov 1 13:44:09 2022 +0100 > 9f2899fe36a6 ("objtool: Add option to generate prefix symbols") > > Coverity reported the following: > > *** CID 1527141: Resource leaks (RESOURCE_LEAK) > tools/objtool/elf.c:833 in elf_create_prefix_symbol() > 827 struct symbol *sym = calloc(1, sizeof(*sym)); > 828 size_t namelen = strlen(orig->name) + sizeof("__pfx_"); > 829 char *name = malloc(namelen); > 830 > 831 if (!sym || !name) { > 832 perror("malloc"); > vvv CID 1527141: Resource leaks (RESOURCE_LEAK) > vvv Variable "sym" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to. > 833 return NULL; > 834 } > 835 > 836 snprintf(name, namelen, "__pfx_%s", orig->name); > 837 > 838 sym->name = name; > > If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as > such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make > sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please > include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first): > > Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1527141 ("Resource leaks") > Fixes: 9f2899fe36a6 ("objtool: Add option to generate prefix symbols") Please disable resource leak checking in objtool. It's a short-lived userspace tool for which we generally don't care about memory leaks. -- Josh