On 08/11/2022 09:15, Niedermayr, BENEDIKT wrote: >>> Another alternative with less churn is to leave them as u32 >>> but make GPMC_WAITPIN_INVALID set to a large positive number. >> Ok, I will fix that. >> Do I need to send a new fix-patch on top the current patch series? >> Or should I just send only the bugfix-patch for the coverity-bot? >> > Sorry, another Question: > Is it somehow possible to check locally if the bugfix actually fixed the bug, before I submit the patch? I think only if you have Coverity somewhere in your company set for testing kernel... Best regards, Krzysztof
