Hello! > From: coverity-bot, Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2022 4:30 AM > > Hello! > > This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by > Coverity from a scan of next-20221104 as part of the linux-next scan project: <snip> > > You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified > lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits: > > Wed Nov 2 12:38:53 2022 +0000 > 3590918b5d07 ("net: ethernet: renesas: Add support for "Ethernet Switch"") > > Coverity reported the following: > > *** CID 1527147: Control flow issues (NO_EFFECT) > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c:270 in rswitch_gwca_queue_alloc_skb() > 264 goto err; > 265 } > 266 > 267 return 0; > 268 > 269 err: > vvv CID 1527147: Control flow issues (NO_EFFECT) > vvv This greater-than-or-equal-to-zero comparison of an unsigned value is always true. "i >= 0U". > 270 for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { > 271 index = (i + start_index) % gq->ring_size; > 272 dev_kfree_skb(gq->skbs[index]); > 273 gq->skbs[index] = NULL; > 274 } > 275 > > If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as > such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make > sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please > include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first): Thank you for the report! I should fix the driver. I also realized that rswitch_gwca_queue_ts_fill() has the same issue. Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda > Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1527147 ("Control flow issues") > Fixes: 3590918b5d07 ("net: ethernet: renesas: Add support for "Ethernet Switch"") > > Thanks for your attention! > > -- > Coverity-bot