Em Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:52:48AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual escreveu:
>
>
> On 9/7/22 08:30, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 08:01:34 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/7/22 00:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:34:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
> >>>> failed like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:866,
> >>>> from /home/sfr/next/next/tools/perf/util/branch.h:9,
> >>>> from util/branch.c:2:
> >>>> In function 'fprintf',
> >>>> inlined from 'branch_type_stat_display' at util/branch.c:152:4:
> >>>> /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:105:10: error: '%8s' directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
> >>>> 105 | return __fprintf_chk (__stream, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, __fmt,
> >>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> 106 | __va_arg_pack ());
> >>>> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >>>>
> >>>> Presumably caused by commit
> >>>>
> >>>> 9781e500dcb8 ("perf branch: Extend branch type classification")
> >>>>
> >>>> "native" here is PowerPC64 LE.
> >>>> $ gcc --version
> >>>> gcc (Debian 11.2.0-10) 11.2.0
> >>>>
> >>>> I have used the perf tree from next-20220830 for today.
> >>>
> >>> I am still seeing this build failure.
> >>
> >> But did you apply the fix patch from Arnaldo that removes -Wno-format-overflow
> >> compiler option for the file util/branch.c ?
> >>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/YxJBh3wvAGol+Ekq@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > No, I expected a fix to be in the perf tree ...
> >
> > Also note that the following fixes the problem for me:
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/branch.c b/tools/perf/util/branch.c
> > index d40776c44b06..b7b898f2872e 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/branch.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/branch.c
> > @@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ const char *branch_type_name(int type)
> > "ERET",
> > "IRQ",
> > "SERROR",
> > - "NO_TX"
> > + "NO_TX",
> > + ""
> > };
> >
> > if (type >= 0 && type < PERF_BR_MAX)
>
> This looks right, makes sense.
>
> >
> >
> > PERF_BR_MAX has been increased by one (when PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI was
> > added), but a new string has not been added to the array ...
>
> Right, even though new branch_new_names[] array gets queried on when type
> value is PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI, branch_names[] should still contain an empty
> string "" just to match the now incremented PERF_BR_MAX which extends the
> array size as well. I guess the compiler detects this mismatch here and
> just complains about it.
>
> Hello Arnaldo,
>
> As adding empty string to the array solves the build problem, I guess we
> should fold this fix instead, rather than trying to drop the compiler
> option itself, as discussed earlier.
I'll do it, and even force push perf/core so that this problem doesn't
get into the bisection history upstream.
- Arnaldo
> The above fix should be folded into the following commit
>
> 9781e500dcb8 ("perf branch: Extend branch type classification")
>
> in the following perf tree - branch.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git (perf/core)
>
> - Anshuman
--
- Arnaldo
