On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 09:49, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
>
> lib/Kconfig.debug
>
> between commit:
>
> 724c299c6a0e ("perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting")
>
> from the tip tree and commit:
>
> bb26bbd0a067 ("fortify: Add KUnit test for FORTIFY_SOURCE internals")
>
> from the kspp tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc lib/Kconfig.debug
> index e40550a5bdd3,1f267c0ddffd..000000000000
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@@ -2533,16 -2542,15 +2545,25 @@@ config STACKINIT_KUNIT_TES
> CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK, CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF,
> or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL.
>
> +config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST
> + bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> + depends on KUNIT=y
> + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + help
> + Tests for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> +
> + config FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST
> + tristate "Test fortified str*() and mem*() function internals at runtime" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + depends on KUNIT && FORTIFY_SOURCE
> + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + help
> + Builds unit tests for checking internals of FORTIFY_SOURCE as used
> + by the str*() and mem*() family of functions. For testing runtime
> + traps of FORTIFY_SOURCE, see LKDTM's "FORTIFY_*" tests.
> +
> config TEST_UDELAY
> tristate "udelay test driver"
> help
Looks good to me, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
