Hi all,
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 12:55:40 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kunit-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
>
> between commit:
>
> d86d1652ab13 ("apparmor: test: Remove some casts which are no-longer required")
>
> from the apparmor tree and commit:
>
> 5f91bd9f1e7a ("apparmor: test: Use NULL macros")
>
> from the kunit-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
> index 399dce3781aa,5c18d2f19862..000000000000
> --- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
> @@@ -408,8 -408,8 +408,8 @@@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u
>
> size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
>
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, NULL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, chunk);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->end - 1);
> }
>
> @@@ -430,8 -430,8 +430,8 @@@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u
>
> size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
>
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, NULL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, chunk);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->start + TEST_U16_OFFSET);
> }
>
This is now a conflict between the apparmor tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp2TzqHiUivz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
