On 22. 6. 29. 22:09, Aidan MacDonald wrote:
>
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> I just noticed that one of my patches wound up in extcon-next as
> commit a7d674db4612 ("extcon: max77843: Replace irqchip mask_invert
> with unmask_base").
>
> That patch has been applied too early and should be reverted/dropped,
> as it depends on changes made in my regmap-irq refactoring series[1].
> My commit message was overly broad and didn't communicate that fact,
> however. Unmask registers are in fact broken right now so the patch
> doesn't work as advertised and will break the driver.
>
> For avoidance of doubt my other two extcon patches you took,
>
> extcon: sm5502: Drop useless mask_invert flag on irqchip
> extcon: rt8973a: Drop useless mask_invert flag on irqchip
>
> are safe to take early and do not need to be reverted.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220623211420.918875-1-aidanmacdonald.0x0@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> Best regards,
> Aidan
Hi Aidan,
Thanks for the report. I'll drop the patch
as you mentioned[1]
[1] "extcon: max77843: Replace irqchip mask_invert with unmask_base".
--
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi
