Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 15 (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 3:44 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/15/22 12:28, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 3:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/14/22 23:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20220614:
> >>>
> >>
> >> on i386:
> >> # CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set
> >>
> >>
> >> ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: In function ‘amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register’:
> >> ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:6599:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘crtc_debugfs_init’; did you mean ‘amdgpu_debugfs_init’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>   crtc_debugfs_init(crtc);
> >>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>   amdgpu_debugfs_init
> >>
> >>
> >> Full randconfig file is attached.
> >
> > I tried building with your config and I can't repro this.  As Harry
> > noted, that function and the whole secure display feature depend on
> > debugfs.  It should never be built without CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.  See
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig:
>
> Did you try building with today's linux-next tree?
> (whatever is in it)
>
> I have seen this build error multiple times so it shouldn't
> be so difficult to repro it.
>
>
> >> config DRM_AMD_SECURE_DISPLAY
> >>         bool "Enable secure display support"
> >>         default n
> >>         depends on DEBUG_FS
> >>         depends on DRM_AMD_DC_DCN
> >>         help
> >>             Choose this option if you want to
> >>             support secure display
> >>
> >>             This option enables the calculation
> >>             of crc of specific region via debugfs.
> >>             Cooperate with specific DMCU FW.
> >
> > amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register is guarded by
> > CONIG_DRM_AMD_SECURE_DISPLAY.  It's not clear to me how we could hit
> > this.

I was able to repro it.  In linux-next the
CONFIG_DRM_AMD_SECURE_DISPLAY ifdefs in
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c seem to be missing.
I guess they were lost when the amdgpu branch was merged into
linux-next.  The attached patch restores the
CONFIG_DRM_AMD_SECURE_DISPLAY protections.

Thanks,

Alex

>
>
> --
> ~Randy
From f67ab0ba8da873a238dcd336acf92c01e4aff031 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:12:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix merge of amdgpu -next branch

Add CONFIG_DRM_AMD_SECURE_DISPLAY protections that were
accidently dropped.

Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
index c9004f7e700d..c0386f237fdc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
@@ -6594,12 +6594,14 @@ dm_crtc_duplicate_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
 	return &state->base;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_AMD_SECURE_DISPLAY
 static int amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
 {
 	crtc_debugfs_init(crtc);
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#endif
 
 static inline int dm_set_vupdate_irq(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool enable)
 {
@@ -6693,7 +6695,9 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs amdgpu_dm_crtc_funcs = {
 	.enable_vblank = dm_enable_vblank,
 	.disable_vblank = dm_disable_vblank,
 	.get_vblank_timestamp = drm_crtc_vblank_helper_get_vblank_timestamp,
+#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_AMD_SECURE_DISPLAY)
 	.late_register = amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register,
+#endif
 };
 
 static enum drm_connector_status
-- 
2.35.3


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux