Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mm-nonmm-stable tree with the userns tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 12 May 2022 18:22:15 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the mm-nonmm-stable tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   include/linux/ptrace.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   c200e4bb44e8 ("ptrace/um: Replace PT_DTRACE with TIF_SINGLESTEP")
> 
> from the userns tree and commit:
> 
>   a9866bef5171 ("ptrace: fix wrong comment of PT_DTRACE")
> 
> from the mm-nonmm-stable tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former removed the line modified by the latter, so I
> just removed it) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
> as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
> be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Thanks.

Eric, I'll send that patch to you for inclusion in the userns tree,
please.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux