On 10/05/22 09:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the folio tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/btrfs/send.c
>
> between commit:
>
> d1a1a97304b4 ("btrfs: send: keep the current inode open while processing it")
>
> from the btrfs tree and commit:
>
> 2ebdd1df3166 ("mm/readahead: Convert page_cache_async_readahead to take a folio")
>
> from the folio tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
Looks correct to me.
Thanks.
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
