Stephen ST Restricted > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 9:42 AM > To: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx> > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux > Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the stm32 > tree > > Hi Alexandre, > > On Wed, 4 May 2022 07:28:53 +0000 Alexandre TORGUE > <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Actually this patch has been already merged in Rob tree. I just > > cherry-pick it in my tree to avoid a merge conflict later for other > > maintainers. So I didn't add my "Signed-off-by". > > You should add a SOB for every patch you add to your published tree. > That includes cherry-picked commits from other trees. > Ok I add it now and update the stm32-next branch. > By the way, most maintainers (and Linus and I) are pretty adept at > sorting out merge conflicts (unless they are really complex, or > course, in which case you should probably have created a branch in one > fo the trees containing the conflicting commits from that tree and > then merge that branch into the both trees - and, of course, noted what is happening in the merge commits). > -- I have no doubt that you could have fixed it 😊. It was also easier for me to add my changes on top of it. Cheers Alex > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell
