On 26/04/2022 10:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/04/2022 10:48, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 26/04/2022 00:07, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Commits
>>>
>>> 775ef8aaa66e ("arm64: dts: mediatek: align thermal zone node names with dtschema")
>>> c8b8db1a173d ("arm64: dts: mediatek: align operating-points table name with dtschema")
>>> c01d9aa630b8 ("arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema")
>>> 75a3c81bc634 ("arm64: dts: hisilicon: align 'freq-table-hz' with dtschema in UFS")
>>>
>>> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
>>>
>>
>> These patches are taken by Krysztof and merge into my tree via a tag [1] to
>> avoid any conflicts. Please let me know if there is anything I need to do to fix
>> this problem.
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Before you merged my branch, which was fine, but later you rebased all
> this thus making yourself committer. Commits pulled from other trees
> should in general not be rebased, because it creates duplicates - there
> are ones in my tree, and separate in yours.
>
> Additionally, such rebase changes the author, so you need your SoB.
Minor update - you not only rebased these commits, but also kept my
branch so even in your tree they are duplicated.
> Since you already rebased it, I propose you add your own SoB to Mediatek
> patches and drop the one hisilicon (75a3c81bc634). I will do the reverse
> - drop Mediatek and keep hisilicon.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
