Re: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the ubifs-fixes tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the ubifs-fixes tree
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 23:17:56 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220324085653.4c4c5315@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20220315205259.71b4238a@canb.auug.org.au> <20220324085653.4c4c5315@canb.auug.org.au>

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> This is now a conflict between the ubifs-fixes tree and Linus' tree.

Thanks for letting me know, I'll note this in my PR to Linus.

Thanks,
//richard

References:
- linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the ubifs-fixes tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the ubifs-fixes tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

Prev by Date: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the asm-generic tree
Next by Date: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the fscache tree
Previous by thread: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the ubifs-fixes tree
Next by thread: next/master build: 198 builds: 17 failed, 181 passed, 31 errors, 53 warnings (next-20220315)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux