On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:04:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 15:35:54 +0100 > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I suggested inhibiting tail-call to notrace, you said no. You now seem to > > agree that solves it. > > I said inhibiting tail-calls was a solution, but only inhibiting it to > notrace would probably have a significant performance impact. > > I thought you were talking about adding notrace to tail calls, not the > other way around. Maybe that is our confusion in this conversation. Yeah, I meant inhibiting the compiler from doing tail-calls.
