On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 21:46:29 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Indeed. I would like to replace the trampoline code of kretprobe with
> > > rethook, eventually. There is no reason why we keep the clone.
> > > (But I need more arch maintainers help for that, there are too many
> > > archs implemented kretprobes)
> >
> > CONFIG_KPROBE_ON_RETHOOK - and then implement archs one by one?
>
> Sounds good! Maybe we will see different data structure fields
> which depends on that config, but those are internal fields, so
> user will not access it.
Which is basically what I do for ftrace. Which is why we have all these:
select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS
select HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT
select HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_MULTI
in the architecture Kconfigs.
-- Steve
