On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:50:17 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Peter has other concerns, please read the thread and consider them. > > Masami is an expert in kprobe. He copy pasted a bit of kprobe logic > to make it into 'multi kprobe' (he calls it fprobe). > I believe he knows what he's doing. > Steven reviewed and tested that set. > We've tested it as well and don't have any correctness or api concerns. I tested it from a ftrace perspective, not an IBT or other work being done in the x86 world. I'm fine with the work being done in kernel/tracing/ but it still requires the arch maintainer's acks for anything in arch/. I was under the impression that the arch specific code was Cc'ing the arch maintainers (which I always do when I touch their code). But I missed that they were not. That's my fault, I should have caught that. -- Steve