Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sysctl tree with the tip tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 08:02:15AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> 
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 13:17:43 -0700 Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:18:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the sysctl tree got a conflict in:
> > > 
> > >   kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > > 
> > > between commit:
> > > 
> > >   eb77cf1c151c ("sched/deadline: Remove unused def_dl_bandwidth")
> > > 
> > > from the tip tree and commit:
> > > 
> > >   ebb891f03580 ("sched: Move deadline_period sysctls to deadline.c")
> > > 
> > > from the sysctl tree.  
> > 
> > Peter,
> > 
> > to help avoid conflicts I spinned up a sysctl-next tree to collect
> > different cleanups going on kernel/sysctl.c. I can drop 
> > ebb891f03580 ("sched: Move deadline_period sysctls to deadline.c")
> > but I think we'd still run into conflicts as other sysctls are
> > trimmed out. Would you be OK in me taking in eb77cf1c151c
> > ("sched/deadline: Remove unused def_dl_bandwidth") to avoid this
> > conflict?
> 
> Its really a trivial conflict and just needs to be mentioned to Linus
> in the pull requests.

Ah alrighty! Thanks!

  Luis




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux