On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 09:12:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:46:40 +0800 Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Can you help me test this patch? I don't have an arm environment around me. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index 1fa2d632a994..4d629d1ea894 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@ static int virtnet_rx_vq_reset(struct virtnet_info *vi, > > > > err: > > netdev_err(vi->dev, > > - "reset rx reset vq fail: rx queue index: %ld err: %d\n", > > + "reset rx reset vq fail: rx queue index: %td err: %d\n", > > rq - vi->rq, err); > > virtnet_napi_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi); > > return err; > > @@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ static int virtnet_tx_vq_reset(struct virtnet_info *vi, > > > > err: > > netdev_err(vi->dev, > > - "reset tx reset vq fail: tx queue index: %ld err: %d\n", > > + "reset tx reset vq fail: tx queue index: %td err: %d\n", > > sq - vi->sq, err); > > virtnet_napi_tx_enable(vi, sq->vq, &sq->napi); > > return err; > > I had to apply that by hand, but it does work. > > Tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> OK, I squashed this into the problematic patch. Thanks a lot! > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell
