Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Feb 24, 2022, at 11:37 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 2/24/22 07:08, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 24, 2022, at 1:45 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a
>>>>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to
>>>>>> attempt at this point.  I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Changes since 20220217:
>>>>> 
>>>>> on x86_64:
>>>>> 
>>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL
>>>>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n]
>>>>> Selected by [y]:
>>>>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y]
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next.
>>> 
>>> Hi Chuck,
>>> 
>>> I'm still seeing this in next-20220223...
>> 
>> I tested my fixed version of the commit with the randconfig
>> you attached to yesterday's email. Do you see this in
>> fs/nfsd/Kconfig from next-20220223 ?
> 
> Not all of it -- it's missing one line:
> 
>> config NFSD_V2_ACL
>>        bool
>>        depends on NFSD
>> 
>> config NFSD_V3_ACL
>>        bool "NFS server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension"
>>        depends on NFSD      <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< HERE <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>>        select NFSD_V2_ACL
>>        help
> 
> When I add that, I no longer see the problem.

That's the fix. I guess next-20220223 hasn't pulled in my latest
for-next yet.

--
Chuck Lever







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux