On 20/12/2021 23:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:40:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> arch/arm/Kconfig
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 54f481a2308e ("ARM: remove old-style irq entry")
>>
>> from the arm tree and commit:
>>
>> 3ac5f9db26bb ("ARM: samsung: Remove HAVE_S3C2410_I2C and use direct dependencies")
>>
>> from the samsung-krzk tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>>
>>
>> diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig
>> index 15bc7fba0761,391f07c17096..000000000000
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@@ -471,7 -478,7 +471,6 @@@ config ARCH_S3C24X
>> select CLKSRC_SAMSUNG_PWM
>> select GPIO_SAMSUNG
>> select GPIOLIB
>> - select HAVE_S3C2410_I2C if I2C
>> - select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
>> select NEED_MACH_IO_H
>> select S3C2410_WATCHDOG
>> select SAMSUNG_ATAGS
>
> This is now a conflict between the arm and arm-soc trees.
>
Thanks for letting us know.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
