Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfs-anna tree with the fscache tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 7:35 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nfs-anna tree got conflicts in:
>
>   fs/nfs/fscache.c
>   fs/nfs/fscache.h
>   fs/nfs/fscache-index.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   882ff66585ec ("nfs: Convert to new fscache volume/cookie API")
>
> from the fscache tree and commits:
>
>   e89edabcb3d4 ("NFS: Remove remaining usages of NFSDBG_FSCACHE")
>   0d20bd7faac9 ("NFS: Cleanup usage of nfs_inode in fscache interface and handle i_size properly")
>   4a0574909596 ("NFS: Rename fscache read and write pages functions")
>   3b779545aa01 ("NFS: Convert NFS fscache enable/disable dfprintks to tracepoints")
>   b9077ca60a13 ("NFS: Replace dfprintks with tracepoints in fscache read and write page functions")
>   416de7e7eeb6 ("NFS: Remove remaining dfprintks related to fscache cookies")
>   fcb692b98976 ("NFS: Use nfs_i_fscache() consistently within NFS fscache code")
>
Anna, feel free to drop these from your tree to avoid the conflicts
with the rest of your tree and dhowells fscache-rewrite patchset.



> from the nfs-anna tree.
>
> I had no idea how to fix this all up, so I just dropped the nfs-anna
> tree for today.   Please get together and coordinate thses changes.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux