On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:15 PM André Almeida <andrealmeid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Às 04:49 de 24/11/21, Arnd Bergmann escreveu:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:31 AM Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 11/23/21 5:38 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >> @@ -451,3 +451,4 @@
> >> 446 common landlock_restrict_self sys_landlock_restrict_self
> >> # 447 reserved for memfd_secret
> >> 448 common process_mrelease sys_process_mrelease
> >> +449 common futex_waitv sys_futex_waitv
> >
> > I don't know what's going on with this one, I don't actually see
> > a reason why it isn't already wired up on all architectures. If we add
> > this, it should probably be done for all architectures at once as a
> > bugfix, but it's possible that this is intentionally only used on
> > x86 and arm.
> >
> > André, can you comment on this?
> >
> I've added entries for the archs that I've actually tested, but there
> should not be any arch-specific problems in futex_waitv. I'll submit a
> patch to wire it up for the remaining architectures.
Ok, thank you.
Arnd
