On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:26:45AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote: > As a second thought - do we need such a stub function at all? I guess > anyone who is actually adding a call to the > rohm_regulator_set_voltage_sel_restricted() helper should also have the > implementation selected. Failing to do so is probably indication of an > error. Compile testing could perhaps be an exception but this is > currently not supported. > Should I just drop the stub or make it inline? Am I overlooking something? Dropping it does seem reasonable, I can't immediately think of a case where the stub would get used. I've queued your existing patch to try to make sure that a fix lands tomorrow so (assuming no test issues) please send a removal patch on top of that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
