On 11/2/21 8:21 PM, Yi Zhang wrote:
>>
>> Can either one of you try with this patch? Won't fix anything, but it'll
>> hopefully shine a bit of light on the issue.
>>
> Hi Jens
>
> Here is the full log:
Thanks! I think I see what it could be - can you try this one as well,
would like to confirm that the condition I think is triggering is what
is triggering.
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 07eb1412760b..81dede885231 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2515,6 +2515,8 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
if (plug && plug->cached_rq) {
rq = rq_list_pop(&plug->cached_rq);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->queuelist);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(q->elevator && !(rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!q->elevator && (rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV));
} else {
struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = {
.q = q,
@@ -2535,6 +2537,8 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
goto queue_exit;
}
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(q->elevator && !(rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!q->elevator && (rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV));
}
trace_block_getrq(bio);
--
Jens Axboe
