Re: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the fscache tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the fscache tree
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 07:04:05 +0000
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20211102090749.009f42b3@canb.auug.org.au>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
References: <20211102090749.009f42b3@canb.auug.org.au> <20210921135421.13eac778@canb.auug.org.au>

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >   405f4ff7f8a3 ("fscache: Remove the old I/O API")

This branch is now obsolete.  I'm testing a replacement branch and will
hopefully push that to fscache-next this morning.

David

References:
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the fscache tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell
- linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the fscache tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

Prev by Date: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the folio tree
Next by Date: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of almost all the trees
Previous by thread: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the fscache tree
Next by thread: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the fscache tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux