On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 21:11:19 -0500
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:54:46PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> > > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct ftrace_ops;
> > > void arch_ftrace_ops_list_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip);
> > > #else
> > > # define FTRACE_FORCE_LIST_FUNC 0
> > > +struct ftrace_regs;
> > > void arch_ftrace_ops_list_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> > > struct ftrace_ops *op, struct ftrace_regs *fregs);
> > > #endif
> > > --
> > > 2.33.0
> >
> > I am still applying this fix ...
>
> I will add this fix to the original patch for my tomorrow's -next tree.
Hmm, I pushed my version to my for-next branch. Do you have this in the
next tree?
34cdd18b8d245f3e901e5325 ("tracing: Use linker magic instead of recasting
ftrace_ops_list_func()")
Which shouldn't need this fix.
-- Steve
