On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:44:44 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ftrace tree got a conflict in:
>
> lib/bootconfig.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 77e02cf57b6c ("memblock: introduce saner 'memblock_free_ptr()' interface")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 6c7324bca2ec ("bootconfig: Fix to check the xbc_node is used before free it")
>
> from the ftrace tree.
>
> The new memblock_free_ptr() inroduced by Linus' tree copes with NULL
> pointers, so I just used that. Which means that the ftrace tree patch
> will be redundant.
>
> I fixed it up (see above) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
No need. Linus had issues with the commit in my tree and did his own fix
instead, which is what is conflicting. Let me go and remove those commits
from my for-next branch.
-- Steve
