> > Hi all,
> >
> >Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c
> >
> >between commit:
> >
> > 801e541c79bb ("nfc: s3fwrn5: fix undefined parameter values in
> > dev_err()")
> >
> > from the net tree and commit:
> > a0302ff5906a ("nfc: s3fwrn5: remove unnecessary label")
> > from the net-next tree.
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
> > tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise
> > any particularly complex conflicts.
> > diff --cc drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c
> > index 1340fab9565e,1421ffd46d9a..000000000000
> > --- a/drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c
> > @@@ -421,10 -421,9 +421,9 @@@ int s3fwrn5_fw_download(struct
> > s3fwrn5_
> >
> > tfm = crypto_alloc_shash("sha1", 0, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(tfm)) {
> >- ret = PTR_ERR(tfm);
> > dev_err(&fw_info->ndev->nfc_dev->dev,
> >- "Cannot allocate shash (code=%d)\n", ret);
> >+ "Cannot allocate shash (code=%ld)\n", PTR_ERR(tfm));
> >- goto out;
> >+ return PTR_ERR(tfm);
> > }
> >
> > ret = crypto_shash_tfm_digest(tfm, fw->image, image_size,
> > hash_data);
Hi Mark,
Thanks for you fix the issue, I'll pay attention to this later.
