Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ide and kspp-gustavo trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andy,

On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:56:13 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 7:13 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> >   2c8cbe0b2971 ("IDE SUBSYSTEM: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones")
> >   9a51ffe845e4 ("ide: use generic power management")
> >   f9e09a0711ca ("ide: sc1200: use generic power management")
> >   d41b375134a9 ("ide: delkin_cb: use generic power management")
> >   6800cd8cbc6e ("ide-acpi: use %*ph to print small buffer")
> >   731d5f441e1c ("ide: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang")
> >
> > from the ide and kspp-gustavo trees and commits:  
> 
> As far as I can tell the IDE hasn't sent PR to LInus for a long time
> (like a few release cycles). I don't know what happened there, though.

Yeah, the top commit in the ide tree (which is intended to hold bug
fixes for Linus' tree) is dated 4 Aug 2020, so hopefully this will
prompt Dave to do something with it.  There has been no ide "future
development" tree in linux-next since 2011.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpqQPknU8wba.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux