On 3/26/21 11:20 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 3/26/21 1:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20210325:
>>
>
> on i386 or x86_64:
> aha:
> # CONFIG_PCI is not set
>
>
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_sch.c:204:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
> module_pci_driver(lpc_sch_driver);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_sch.c:204:1: error: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘module_pci_driver’ [-Werror=implicit-int]
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_sch.c:204:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_sch.c:197:26: warning: ‘lpc_sch_driver’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
> static struct pci_driver lpc_sch_driver = {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> Full x86_64 randconfig file is attached.
This is the root of the problem I think:
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for LPC_SCH
Depends on [n]: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && PCI [=n]
Selected by [m]:
- GPIO_SCH [=m] && GPIOLIB [=y] && X86 [=y] && (X86 [=y] || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && ACPI [=y]
Denis, that still looks like it's your territory.
thanks.
--
~Randy
