Hi Viresh, On 3/25/21 6:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24-03-21, 16:49, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: >> Thanks Stephen! >> >> On 3/23/21 2:27 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Today's linux-next merge of the opp tree got a conflict in: >>> >>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c >>> >>> between commit: >>> >>> 08b1cf474b7f ("media: venus: core, venc, vdec: Fix probe dependency error") >>> >>> from the v4l-dvb tree and commit: >>> >>> 857219ae4043 ("media: venus: Convert to use resource-managed OPP API") >>> >>> from the opp tree. >>> >>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This >>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial >>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree >>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating >>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly >>> complex conflicts. >>> >> >> I don't know what is the best solution here. >> >> Viresh, Can I take the OPP API changes through media-tree to avoid >> conflicts? > > I already suggested something similar earlier, and I was expecting > Thierry to respond to that.. Not sure who should pick those patches. > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210318103250.shjyd66pxw2g2nsd@vireshk-i7/ I guess you meant this thread. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210314163408.22292-1-digetx@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Can you please respond to this series then ? > Done. -- regards, Stan