Hi all, On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:01:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:48:06 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in: > > > > fs/f2fs/file.c > > > > between commits: > > > > 19bb7075d1a9 ("f2fs: fix out-of-repair __setattr_copy()") > > 7cf2e6173b2d ("f2fs: enhance to update i_mode and acl atomically in f2fs_setattr()") > > > > from the f2fs tree and commit: > > > > 2f221d6f7b88 ("attr: handle idmapped mounts") > > e65ce2a50cf6 ("acl: handle idmapped mounts") > > > > from the pidfd tree. > > > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > > complex conflicts. > > > > diff --cc fs/f2fs/file.c > > index 7db27c81d034,8f1e97e7d242..000000000000 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > @@@ -851,9 -848,9 +852,10 @@@ static void __setattr_copy(struct user_ > > inode->i_ctime = attr->ia_ctime; > > if (ia_valid & ATTR_MODE) { > > umode_t mode = attr->ia_mode; > > + kgid_t kgid = i_gid_into_mnt(mnt_userns, inode); > > > > - if (!in_group_p(inode->i_gid) && > > - !capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(inode, CAP_FSETID)) > > - if (!in_group_p(kgid) && !capable(CAP_FSETID)) > > ++ if (!in_group_p(kgid) && > > ++ !capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(mnt_userns, inode, CAP_FSETID)) > > mode &= ~S_ISGID; > > set_acl_inode(inode, mode); > > } > > @@@ -958,14 -948,13 +961,14 @@@ int f2fs_setattr(struct user_namespace > > spin_unlock(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_size_lock); > > } > > > > - __setattr_copy(inode, attr); > > + __setattr_copy(&init_user_ns, inode, attr); > > > > if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_MODE) { > > - err = posix_acl_chmod(inode, f2fs_get_inode_mode(inode)); > > - > > + err = posix_acl_chmod(&init_user_ns, inode, > > + f2fs_get_inode_mode(inode)); > > - if (err || is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_ACL_MODE)) { > > - inode->i_mode = F2FS_I(inode)->i_acl_mode; > > + if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_ACL_MODE)) { > > + if (!err) > > + inode->i_mode = F2FS_I(inode)->i_acl_mode; > > clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ACL_MODE); > > } > > } > > With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this > conflict still exists. > > The fsf2 tree commits are now > > 17232e830afb ("f2fs: enhance to update i_mode and acl atomically in f2fs_setattr()") > 2562515f0ad7 ("f2fs: fix out-of-repair __setattr_copy()") This is now a conflict between the pidfd tree and Linus' tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpmaw4UWJwXw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature