Hi all, On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:11:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:42:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the irqchip tree got a conflict in: > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml > > > > between commit: > > > > 752b0aac99c7 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun7i-nmi: Add binding documentation for the V3s NMI") > > > > from the sunxi tree and commit: > > > > ad6b47cdef76 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Split the binding from sun7i-nmi") > > > > from the irqchip tree. > > > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as > > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any > > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer > > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider > > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any > > particularly complex conflicts. > > > > diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml > > index 4fd1e2780026,f34ecc8c7093..000000000000 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml > > @@@ -25,17 -25,7 +25,10 @@@ properties > > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi > > deprecated: true > > - const: allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi > > - - items: > > - - const: allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-intc > > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc > > + - items: > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-nmi > > + - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi > > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi > > - - items: > > - - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-r-intc > > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc > > - items: > > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a100-nmi > > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi > > With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this > conflict still exists. It is now between the arm-soc tree and the > irqchip tree. This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and the tip tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpIhrbdF5i9N.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature