On 2/3/21 2:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:34 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/3/21 9:09 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:12 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 983cb10d3f90 ("mm/gup: do not migrate zero page")
>>>>
>>>> I have applied the following patch for today:
>>>>
>>>> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:49:00 +1100
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] make is_pinnable_page a macro
>>>>
>>>> As it is currently defined before page_to_section() which it needs.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> I still see the same problem in next-20210203, and your patch below
>>> fixes it for me.
>>> Did you drop it from the latest build?
>>>
>>
>> After the most recent build errors, I tried to apply Pavel's patch
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CA+CK2bBjC8=cRsL5VhWkcevPsqSXWhsANVjsFNMERLT8vWtiQw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> but patch said that it was already applied (by Andrew I think),
>> so I bailed out (gave up).
>
> As far as I can tell, there are two different bugs that got mixed up, and
> we need both Pavel's patch (which is now in -next) and Stephen's
> (which got dropped again).
Thanks. Having both patches makes my builds happy again. :)
--
~Randy
