Hi all,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:23:36 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 176cfe865da6 ("ecryptfs: fix uid translation for setxattr on security.capability")
>
> from the overlayfs tree and commit:
>
> c7c7a1a18af4 ("xattr: handle idmapped mounts")
>
> from the pidfd tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> index 58d0f7187997,55da9a91f51a..000000000000
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> @@@ -1024,11 -1043,10 +1045,12 @@@ ecryptfs_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry
> rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto out;
> }
> - rc = vfs_setxattr(&init_user_ns, lower_dentry, name, value, size,
> - flags);
> + inode_lock(lower_inode);
> - rc = __vfs_setxattr_locked(lower_dentry, name, value, size, flags, NULL);
> ++ rc = __vfs_setxattr_locked(&init_user_ns, lower_dentry, name,
> ++ value, size, flags, NULL);
> + inode_unlock(lower_inode);
> if (!rc && inode)
> - fsstack_copy_attr_all(inode, d_inode(lower_dentry));
> + fsstack_copy_attr_all(inode, lower_inode);
> out:
> return rc;
> }
This is now a conflict between the pidfd tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpF08G8ik6o7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
