On 1/25/21 11:35 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>
>> Il giorno 25 gen 2021, alle ore 10:40, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In commit
>>
>> d4fc3640ff36 ("block, bfq: set next_rq to waker_bfqq->next_rq in waker injection")
>>
>> Fixes tag
>>
>> Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject their I/O")
>>
>> has these problem(s):
>>
>> - Target SHA1 does not exist
>>
>> Maybe you meant
>>
>> Fixes: 13a857a4c4e8 ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject their I/O")
>>
>
> Hi Jens,
> how to proceed in such a case (with patches already applied by you)?
> Shall I send you a v2 with only this change?
We just have to ignore it... But in the future, always double check that
you are using the right shas, not some sha from an internal tree.
--
Jens Axboe
