Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the ext4 tree got a conflict in:
fs/ext4/super.c
between commit:
8446fe9255be ("block: switch partition lookup to use struct block_device")
from Linus' tree and commit:
8e6f04c5e918 ("ext4: use sbi instead of EXT4_SB(sb) in ext4_update_super()")
from the ext4 tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/ext4/super.c
index 830c196ec069,f53e69ec858d..000000000000
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@@ -5499,22 -5493,76 +5487,72 @@@ static void ext4_update_super(struct su
*/
if (!(sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY))
ext4_update_tstamp(es, s_wtime);
- if (sb->s_bdev->bd_part)
- es->s_kbytes_written =
- cpu_to_le64(sbi->s_kbytes_written +
- ((part_stat_read(sb->s_bdev->bd_part,
- sectors[STAT_WRITE]) -
- sbi->s_sectors_written_start) >> 1));
- else
- es->s_kbytes_written = cpu_to_le64(sbi->s_kbytes_written);
+ es->s_kbytes_written =
- cpu_to_le64(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_kbytes_written +
++ cpu_to_le64(sbi->s_kbytes_written +
+ ((part_stat_read(sb->s_bdev, sectors[STAT_WRITE]) -
- EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sectors_written_start) >> 1));
- if (percpu_counter_initialized(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_freeclusters_counter))
++ sbi->s_sectors_written_start) >> 1));
+ if (percpu_counter_initialized(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter))
ext4_free_blocks_count_set(es,
- EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(sb), percpu_counter_sum_positive(
- &EXT4_SB(sb)->s_freeclusters_counter)));
- if (percpu_counter_initialized(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_freeinodes_counter))
+ EXT4_C2B(sbi, percpu_counter_sum_positive(
+ &sbi->s_freeclusters_counter)));
+ if (percpu_counter_initialized(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter))
es->s_free_inodes_count =
cpu_to_le32(percpu_counter_sum_positive(
- &EXT4_SB(sb)->s_freeinodes_counter));
- BUFFER_TRACE(sbh, "marking dirty");
+ &sbi->s_freeinodes_counter));
+ /* Copy error information to the on-disk superblock */
+ spin_lock(&sbi->s_error_lock);
+ if (sbi->s_add_error_count > 0) {
+ es->s_state |= cpu_to_le16(EXT4_ERROR_FS);
+ if (!es->s_first_error_time && !es->s_first_error_time_hi) {
+ __ext4_update_tstamp(&es->s_first_error_time,
+ &es->s_first_error_time_hi,
+ sbi->s_first_error_time);
+ strncpy(es->s_first_error_func, sbi->s_first_error_func,
+ sizeof(es->s_first_error_func));
+ es->s_first_error_line =
+ cpu_to_le32(sbi->s_first_error_line);
+ es->s_first_error_ino =
+ cpu_to_le32(sbi->s_first_error_ino);
+ es->s_first_error_block =
+ cpu_to_le64(sbi->s_first_error_block);
+ es->s_first_error_errcode =
+ ext4_errno_to_code(sbi->s_first_error_code);
+ }
+ __ext4_update_tstamp(&es->s_last_error_time,
+ &es->s_last_error_time_hi,
+ sbi->s_last_error_time);
+ strncpy(es->s_last_error_func, sbi->s_last_error_func,
+ sizeof(es->s_last_error_func));
+ es->s_last_error_line = cpu_to_le32(sbi->s_last_error_line);
+ es->s_last_error_ino = cpu_to_le32(sbi->s_last_error_ino);
+ es->s_last_error_block = cpu_to_le64(sbi->s_last_error_block);
+ es->s_last_error_errcode =
+ ext4_errno_to_code(sbi->s_last_error_code);
+ /*
+ * Start the daily error reporting function if it hasn't been
+ * started already
+ */
+ if (!es->s_error_count)
+ mod_timer(&sbi->s_err_report, jiffies + 24*60*60*HZ);
+ le32_add_cpu(&es->s_error_count, sbi->s_add_error_count);
+ sbi->s_add_error_count = 0;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&sbi->s_error_lock);
+
ext4_superblock_csum_set(sb);
- if (sync)
- lock_buffer(sbh);
+ unlock_buffer(sbh);
+ }
+
+ static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb)
+ {
+ struct buffer_head *sbh = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh;
+ int error = 0;
+
+ if (!sbh || block_device_ejected(sb))
+ return error;
+
+ ext4_update_super(sb);
+
if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh) || !buffer_uptodate(sbh)) {
/*
* Oh, dear. A previous attempt to write the
Attachment:
pgp1MlaPAl9R3.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
