On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:52:26PM -0800, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote: > On 12/14/20 3:37 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 06:18:54PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 6:16 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 07:34:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:56:20 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't plan to merge this upstream via my tree. I was just carrying > > > it in my drm-next branch because we have a number of users that depend > > > on it for working DPC and a number of people use this branch for > > > testing. > > > > OK, thanks. FWIW, it's currently marked "Changes Requested" in > > patchwork, so it isn't really going anywhere right now: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/cbba08a5e9ca62778c8937f44eda2192a2045da7.1595617529.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > There is a newer version of this patch set. Please use it when > merging this patch. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=370855 That one is still pending. I haven't had a chance to look at it yet, but seems like there's no point in carrying the superseded version in drm-next.
