Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock:use a more appropriate order calculation when free memblock pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/12/2020 16:07, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> On 04.12.2020 14:42, Qian Cai wrote:
>> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 23:23 +0800, carver4lio@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>> From: Hailong Liu <liu.hailong6@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> When system in the booting stage, pages span from [start, end] of a memblock
>>> are freed to buddy in a order as large as possible (less than MAX_ORDER) at
>>> first, then decrease gradually to a proper order(less than end) in a loop.
>>>
>>> However, *min(MAX_ORDER - 1UL, __ffs(start))* can not get the largest order
>>> in some cases.
>>> Instead, *__ffs(end - start)* may be more appropriate and meaningful.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hailong Liu <liu.hailong6@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reverting this commit on the top of today's linux-next fixed boot crashes on
>> multiple NUMA systems.
> 
> I confirm. Reverting commit 4df001639c84 ("mm/memblock: use a more 
> appropriate order calculation when free memblock pages") on top of linux 
> next-20201204 fixed booting of my ARM32bit test systems.


FWIW, I also confirm that this is causing several 32-bit Tegra platforms
to crash on boot and reverting this fixes the problem.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux