On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:36:10AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 12/3/20 4:01 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:25:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> diff --cc arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h > >> index 015beafe58f5,cdcf307764aa..000000000000 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h > >> @@@ -63,7 -66,9 +63,8 @@@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct ta > >> #define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME 2 /* callback before returning to user */ > >> #define TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE 3 /* CPU's FP state is not current's */ > >> #define TIF_UPROBE 4 /* uprobe breakpoint or singlestep */ > >> - #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT 5 /* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */ > >> -#define TIF_FSCHECK 5 /* Check FS is USER_DS on return */ > >> ++#define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL 5 /* signal notifications exist */ > >> + #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT 6 /* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */ > >> -#define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL 7 /* signal notifications exist */ > >> #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE 8 /* syscall trace active */ > >> #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 9 /* syscall auditing */ > >> #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT 10 /* syscall tracepoint for ftrace */ > >> @@@ -96,7 -103,8 +98,8 @@@ > >> > >> #define _TIF_WORK_MASK (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \ > >> _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE | \ > >> - _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT) > >> - _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_FSCHECK | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \ > >> ++ _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \ > >> + _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL) > > > > Thanks Stephen. It looks alright to me. > > Agree - I'll rebase my tree when -rc7 is out so we won't have this issue once > the 5.11 merge window opens. I don't think rebasing on -rc7 will help since the arm64 commit b5a5a01d8e9a is queued for 5.11 (so not in -rc7). It shouldn't matter much, Linus likes the occasional conflict ;). Anyway, I can wait for your pull request to go in if you'd prefer (and if it happens in the first week of the merging window). -- Catalin
