On 01-12-20, 11:47, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 11:42 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 01-12-20, 11:16, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > > This driver includes the following two files directly:
> > > - mt7621.h
> > > - ralink_regs.h
> > >
> > > Compilation for its related platform properly works because
> > > its real path is included in 'arch/mips/ralink/Platform' as
> > > cflags.
> > >
> > > This driver depends on RALINK but also is enabled for COMPILE_TEST
> > > where nothing about its platform is known and this directly
> > > included files are not found at all breaking compilation.
> > >
> > > Fix this problem adding include search path for ralink in
> > > ralink phy directory Makefile.
> > >
> > > Fixes: d87da32372a0 ("phy: ralink: Add PHY driver for MT7621 PCIe PHY")
> >
> > Pls add reported-by sfr..
>
> Ok, Will change this and send v2.
>
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/phy/ralink/Makefile | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/ralink/Makefile b/drivers/phy/ralink/Makefile
> > > index cda2a4a7ca5e..c8f9adba0d82 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/phy/ralink/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/phy/ralink/Makefile
> > > @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
> > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > +
> > > +ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ralink
> >
> > Can we include <asm/mips/...> instead of using this?
>
> Doing that also fails because path for 'arch/mips/include' is not
> added also because we are compiling in x86_64.
> Looking into other drivers I see the way to avoid this kind of
> platform specific stuff is adding related paths in
> cflags. So I don't really know if there is another way.
Right, ideally these headers should have been in include/linux, but.. I
dont like this way, can we drop compile test..?
--
~Vinod
