On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 18:03, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 05:45:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> > Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst:296: WARNING: Malformed table.
> > Text in column margin in table line 61.
> >
> > ========================== ===================================================
> > Field Content
> > ========================== ===================================================
> ...
> > Speculation_Store_Bypass speculative store bypass mitigation status
> > Speculation_Indirect_Branch indirect branch speculation mode
> ...
> > ========================== ===================================================
> > Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst:234: WARNING: Error parsing content block for the "table" directive: exactly one table expected.
>
> Looks like left column became too wide, so rather than shift the right
> column to the right, I'd suggest to drop underscores in Speculation*.
Hm. That makes it inconsistent with Speculation_Store_Bypass. I guess
it's the lesser of two evils.
How would I go about fixing this? Send a new (v2), fixed patch to the
mailing list? I'm not that familiar with how patches get merged
through the branches.
>
> >
> > .. table:: Table 1-2: Contents of the status files (as of 4.19)
> >
> > ========================== ===================================================
> > Field Content
> > ========================== ===================================================
> ...
> > Speculation_Store_Bypass speculative store bypass mitigation status
> > Speculation_Indirect_Branch indirect branch speculation mode
> > Cpus_allowed mask of CPUs on which this process may run
> > Cpus_allowed_list Same as previous, but in "list format"
> > Mems_allowed mask of memory nodes allowed to this process
> > Mems_allowed_list Same as previous, but in "list format"
> > voluntary_ctxt_switches number of voluntary context switches
> > nonvoluntary_ctxt_switches number of non voluntary context switches
> > ========================== ===================================================
>
> Same here.
>
> > Introduced by commit
> >
> > 60b492d745d5 ("proc: provide details on indirect branch speculation")
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
--
Anand K. Mistry
Software Engineer
Google Australia
