On 10/30/20 9:52 AM, Qian Cai wrote: > On Fri, 2020-10-30 at 09:27 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 10/30/20 9:24 AM, Qian Cai wrote: >>> We will need to call putname() before do_renameat2() returning -EINVAL >>> to avoid memory leaks. >> >> Thanks, should mention that this isn't final by any stretch (which is >> why it hasn't been posted yet), just pushed out for some exposure. > > I don't know what other people think about this, but I do find a bit > discouraging in testing those half-baked patches in linux-next where it does not > even ready to post for a review. I don't disagree with that and this doesn't normally happen. I don't want to get into the reasonings, but things had to be shuffled which is why they ended up in -next before being posted this week. They will go out shortly. -- Jens Axboe
