Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the iommu tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 15:22:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   include/linux/iommu.h
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   23cc3493b5e1 ("iommu/uapi: Rename uapi functions")
>   d90573812eea ("iommu/uapi: Handle data and argsz filled by users")
> 
> from the iommu tree and commit:
> 
>   c7b6bac9c72c ("drm, iommu: Change type of pasid to u32")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I used the former version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the iommu tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgp8Ya_Z9c4JY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux