Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the amdgpu tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:13:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   59d7115dae02 ("drm/amdkfd: Move process doorbell allocation into kfd device")
> 
> from the amdgpu tree and commit:
> 
>   c7b6bac9c72c ("drm, iommu: Change type of pasid to u32")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> index 739db04080d0,922ae138ab85..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> @@@ -739,7 -723,8 +739,7 @@@ struct kfd_process 
>   	/* We want to receive a notification when the mm_struct is destroyed */
>   	struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
>   
> - 	uint16_t pasid;
> + 	u32 pasid;
>  -	unsigned int doorbell_index;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * List of kfd_process_device structures,

This is now a conflict between the tip tree and the drm tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpEXP4PsoR2T.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux