Hi Josh, On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 09:30:12 -0500 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:10:56PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > Josh, any ideas? We could, of course, make it "r"(size), but that would > > > be unpleasant in all existing callers... > > > > Sorry, I've been traveling. I'd just vote for making it "r". > > > > array_index_nospec() is always called after a usercopy. I don't think > > anyone will notice the extra mov, for the cases where it would be > > propagated as an immediate. And the argument *is* an unsigned long > > after all. > > > > Stephen, can you confirm this fixes it? > > Still traveling, I didn't see an update on this. Any objections to the > below? I assume it fixes Stephen's build issue. Yes, it does fix my x86_64 allnoconfig build. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpM2iZpAsv0V.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
