Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the mfd tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 08:22, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
>
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
>
> between commit:
>
>   18394297562a ("dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Merge Samsung Exynos Sysreg bindings")
>   05027df1b94f ("dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Document Exynos3 and Exynos5433 compatibles")
>
> from the mfd tree and commit:
>
>   35b096dd6353 ("dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: add some compatible strings for Hisilicon")
>
> from the devicetree tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
> index 0f21943dea28,fc2e85004d36..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
> @@@ -40,11 -40,10 +40,14 @@@ properties
>                 - allwinner,sun50i-a64-system-controller
>                 - microchip,sparx5-cpu-syscon
>                 - mstar,msc313-pmsleep
>  +              - samsung,exynos3-sysreg
>  +              - samsung,exynos4-sysreg
>  +              - samsung,exynos5-sysreg
>  +              - samsung,exynos5433-sysreg
> -
> +               - hisilicon,hi6220-sramctrl
> +               - hisilicon,pcie-sas-subctrl
> +               - hisilicon,peri-subctrl
> +               - hisilicon,dsa-subctrl

Thanks Stephen, looks good.

Zhei,
However the Huawei compatibles in the original patch were added not
alphabetically which messes the order and increases the possibility of
conflicts. It would be better if the entries were kept ordered.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

>             - const: syscon
>
>         - contains:



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux